top of page

Blade Runner 2049 Review

  • Writer: Ezra Vaoifi
    Ezra Vaoifi
  • Oct 22, 2024
  • 2 min read

Blade Runner 2049 was perhaps the most anticipated sequel in modern movie history, right next to Star Wars: Episode 1. The 1980's smash hit Blade Runner captivated viewers for decades with its futuristic vehicles and stunning special effects. It guessed and estimated the future with such cunning accuracy. It was a realistic depiction of future earth: flying cars, light beams, huge mechanical buildings, super cities of gargantuan proportions. The characters were at times oppositional, and not what we wanted, but the overall theme and world of it was what we wanted. So with the sequel, much was anticipated of more of the same: futuristic flying cars, a neo technological city, robots everywhere, and sleek modern design. This was only part of what we got with Blade Runner 2049.

At the beginning of the movie, it starts out slow and very primitive. Most of the settings look like they could be from our modern time now. And not much happened in the opening scenes, or even in the first 30 minutes of Blade Runner 2049. I was bored. I was so hyped and anticipated, and that hope and anticipation was completely wrecked. I wanted cool characters, I wanted future light machines. I wanted techno music. I wanted something alluring and exciting. It's BLADE RUNNER for goodness sake. The object of obsession of so many teenage boys and girls and adults for that matter. It made such scientific sense. It was carried so well by Harrison Ford. It hit a niche that had never been hit before. It's special effects were so cutting edge. So with Blade 2049, we wanted so much. It ran for too long. And the characters were not strong enough. You had Ryan Gosling who is a very good actor and will make the movie "good". But there were not many others. Batista was in it at the beginning, and was hardly memorable. 2049 lacked so much flavor.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page